On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd?
Ana, could you please have a last word about this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
- Bug#939181: cycle: should it be RM'd ? Scott Talbert
- Bug#939181: cycle: should it be RM'd ? Andreas Tille
- Bug#939181: cycle: should it be RM'd ? Ana Guerrero Lopez
