On February 23, 2020 3:11:46 PM EST, Marco Bodrato <bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it> wrote: >Ciao, > >Il Dom, 9 Febbraio 2020 9:34 pm, Steven Robbins ha scritto: >> On Sunday, February 9, 2020 9:54:02 A.M. CST Marco Bodrato wrote: >>> So, if the new release of the library is able to answer that the number >>> 3878888047 is prime, and not only "probably" prime... This should not be >>> marked as a regression... >> >> Indeed! Thanks for investigating. An improvement could be simply that > >> Is there a bug for libmath-gmp-perl for this test suite issue? > >It seems to me that all packages incorrectly using the internal >representation and not the documented interface of GMP where patched. > >What else stops migration of GMP to testing? Maybe a release of GMP >explicitly saying that it breaks: > libmath-gmp-perl < 2.20 > libmath-prime-util-gmp-perl < 0.51-2 > postgresql-pgmp < 1.0.4 >is needed? So that nobody will update the library without updating also >the other possibly failing packages? > >Ĝis, >m >
GMP is not migrating because this bug was marked as done by uploading postgresql-pgmp. However, this bug is filed against GMP, so the bug metadata still suggests that GMP 6.2.0 introduces this serious issue.