On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:12:31PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > Right now I see three possible "fixes" for the libgs problem: > > > [...] > > > > - fix the code, link to libgs during the build, as is done with all the > > > > other libraries qgle depends on. I do not understand why libgs is > > > > treated > > > > differently, there may be a reason, I just don't know. I think > > > > Laurence is > > > > working on that, but maybe somebody else working on gle can comment. > > > > > > I think this is probably the best strategy, but, as I said, let's hear > > > what upstream developers have to say on this. > > > > > > In the meanwhile, I would like to suggest once more that you upload the > > > fixes for the serious bug (Qt5 porting) and for the other bug (qgle > > > segfault)! > > > > Agreed, it would be good if we could move forward with the Qt5 change, > > we've closing in on the Qt4 removal and this is one of the ~ three dozen > > packages left. > > Status update: Qt4 has now been droppped from testing, qt4 will be removed > from unstable by end of February (along with the remaining rdeps (currently > 15)).
I've now filed a removal bug for gle-graphics. It can be re-introduced when a stable Qt5 port is available, there's plenty of time until the next freeze. Cheers, Moritz