Your message dated Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:17:21 +0100
with message-id <20200322201721.gb8...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: powder_118+dfsg1-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable,
unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #953488,
regarding powder: binaries for non-free not auto-built
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
953488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953488
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: src:powder
version: 118+dfsg1-3
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of powder to unstable has no binaries.
The buildds are not building it, because it is in non-free.
If the binaries can be auto-built, the package should be whitelisted, as
described in
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#non-free-buildd
If not, a binary upload must be done (note that binary maintainer uploads for
sources in contrib and non-free are allowed to migrate to testing).
Cheers,
Ivo
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 08:11:48PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Accepted:
> Binary: powder powder-dbgsym
> Architecture: amd64
> Version: 118+dfsg1-3
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
--- End Message ---
