Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:20:55 +0100
with message-id <ff8737b7-2ac3-1a2b-184b-6a361503e...@p10link.net>
and subject line re: rust-unicode-width: uninstallable featureset packages.
has caused the Debian Bug report #956393,
regarding rust-unicode-width: uninstallable featureset packages.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
956393: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956393
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rust-unicode-width
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
librust-unicode-width+std-dev and librust-unicode-width+rustc-dep-of-std-dev
are not installable as they depend on
librust-rustc-std-workspace-std-1+default-dev which does not seem to exist in
debian.
This is blocking the rust-unicode-width source package from migrating to
testing, which in turn is holding up rust-cbindgen from getting back into
testing.
googling seems to suggest that "rustc-std-workspace-std" is a "hack for the
compilers own build system" and not something intended for general use.
Should these featureset packages simply be dropped?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.1.7-2
After sylvestre invited me into the rust team and after some discussions on
IRC, I went ahead and removed the broken featureset packages in unstable.
To allow this change to be reverted if desired without a trip through new I
first uploaded a copy of the package with the broken featureset packages still
in place to experimental and made sure my unstable uploads had a lower version
number than the experimental upload.
--- End Message ---
