Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:49:17 +0000
with message-id <e1jqcpt-000a5g...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#954676: fixed in pasdoc 0.15.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #954676,
regarding pasdoc: FTBFS: dh_installman: error: Could not determine section for 
./pasdoc.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
954676: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954676
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pasdoc
Version: 0.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>  fakeroot debian/rules binary
> dh binary
>    dh_testroot
>    dh_prep
>    dh_auto_install
>    dh_install
>    dh_installdocs
>    dh_installchangelogs
>    dh_installman
> dh_installman: error: Could not determine section for ./pasdoc.1
> dh_installman: error: Aborting due to earlier error
> make: *** [debian/rules:13: binary] Error 25

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/03/22/pasdoc_0.15.0-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pasdoc
Source-Version: 0.15.0-2
Done: Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pasdoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 954...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> (supplier of updated pasdoc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:18:23 +0200
Source: pasdoc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.15.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Pascal Packaging Team <pkg-pascal-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>
Closes: 954676
Changes:
 pasdoc (0.15.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Use dh_install instead of dh_installman as help2man is broken (Closes:
     #954676)
   * Switch to compat 13 (via debhelper-compat B-D)
   * Bump standards to 4.5.0
   * Fix Vcs-Browser field
   * Add check for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS in dh_auto_test override
   * Add R³: no
Checksums-Sha1:
 ffabf924c9c7a4c52864ab1974e1f6c4e7903018 1779 pasdoc_0.15.0-2.dsc
 b5d76aa8d7fda727af79ba85cf833b728ac23769 6256 pasdoc_0.15.0-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 adbb5ae032b9115d77530bc0b4804cbffc1e8389926c8423146b1165843273e0 1779 
pasdoc_0.15.0-2.dsc
 74ad7cc837bf5995c86316802ce8630e5aebb3942c9acacd57cc2a7f593c5960 6256 
pasdoc_0.15.0-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 b1057d4e307057b1b950ea8daa1d8d77 1779 doc optional pasdoc_0.15.0-2.dsc
 f18d1156a8e413d3b45189511e95af42 6256 doc optional 
pasdoc_0.15.0-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAl6d914ACgkQnFyZ6wW9
dQrWVwf/TVL9Txg1yEp5L4BWRlXaeCrRy075wIJ0oGy7ZhP+PLBGJCBknF99EaZ5
DMXWwbAHJj9WjL1VFI0aZUgs+bJi9FW+lHfaW8VhEOFyg9rE7WTFn6b/gqnklRIi
ELtFtM3imqHrrGdnUfnXTSM35Zcz+hyK6eWjcYVXyzni9p0rGkymfa9Rzfmgmrpl
kbT19zib+JE/gCrAJHOPeRvqdFL9ExaZT2Jg9bULEWQWinKy0Tgz/ET1w1Kwi7l1
jnvp73EiFrLgTqSycXclGLD9rUkG46cOaSEmZZWCH8A7GINUisQteLh6buw9szMY
smvrg9B5Av2U867JbXweLfZue6A5yg==
=4KUi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to