Pierre HABOUZIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tag 362959 =
> tag 362959 + patch
> thanks
>
> I confirm. I have tracked that issue down, it's because upstream takes
> pointer on things that should be gsizes (aka 64 bits on amd64) on things
> that are gints (32bits).
Pointer should be put into intpointer_t if you must. Or better make a
union of int and pointer if you have to mix the two. glib should have
its own type for intpointer_t or use that itself. Reusing gsizes
sounds awfully wrong. Isn't that 64bit on 32bit cpus as well?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
