Your message dated Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:29:45 +0000
with message-id <e1jikst-000buy...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#962554: fixed in libgff 1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #962554,
regarding libgff: autopkgtest failure: g++: command not found
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
962554: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libgff
Version: 1.0-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always

Dear maintainer(s),

You recently added an autopkgtest to your package libgff, great.
However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to
testing [1]. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it?

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It seems your
missing a test dependency.

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libgff

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libg/libgff/5745328/log.gz

autopkgtest [01:31:53]: test run-unit-test: [-----------------------
Compiling ...
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.jdtmjb_x/downtmp/build.8uM/src/debian/tests/run-unit-test:
line 18: g++: command not found
autopkgtest [01:31:53]: test run-unit-test: -----------------------]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libgff
Source-Version: 1.0-4
Done: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 962...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> (supplier of updated libgff package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 22:01:02 +0200
Source: libgff
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team 
<debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
Closes: 962554
Changes:
 libgff (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Test-Depends: build-essential
     Closes: #962554
Checksums-Sha1:
 947f52988cbea8021b62ce625bb6f2b8e38fcc23 2008 libgff_1.0-4.dsc
 887da34add955186539f674abd49a8e8c37c5bd6 4160 libgff_1.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 6d6e68c65f1964d33975c97563e9e7bb9cdf98d1 6273 libgff_1.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 142ba94ff07131db1bd426aeb186d276e41ef1987d8e94b901797155de4b2aee 2008 
libgff_1.0-4.dsc
 197e3bba721935dac94059730b54a6f395d8b941abe5b9e88266351290d35332 4160 
libgff_1.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 64baf8d8d1b8061720e38c54e54f8066466cdd7a5e0155d0d9f73d607636eb7f 6273 
libgff_1.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 c6989fa1a5a576a31a015ccfda365bbb 2008 libdevel optional libgff_1.0-4.dsc
 bcb10f56d253951bd80a043ea6b7e157 4160 libdevel optional 
libgff_1.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 6eb86d8762a028941c8469cfb69357f4 6273 libdevel optional 
libgff_1.0-4_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=O5eP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to