Your message dated Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:33:35 +0000
with message-id <e1jjebz-000cdj...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#961986: fixed in lix 0.9.29-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #961986,
regarding lix FTBFS: Error: undefined identifier `FracSec`, did you mean 
function `fracSec`?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
961986: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lix
Version: 0.9.29-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lix&suite=sid

...
sdlang-d 0.10.4: building configuration "library"...
.dub/packages/sdlang-d-0.10.4/sdlang-d/src/sdlang/token.d(28,21): Error: 
undefined identifier `FracSec`, did you mean function `fracSec`?
.dub/packages/sdlang-d-0.10.4/sdlang-d/src/sdlang/token.d(29,18): Error: 
undefined identifier `FracSec`, did you mean function `fracSec`?
.dub/packages/sdlang-d-0.10.4/sdlang-d/src/sdlang/token.d(48,21): Error: 
undefined identifier `FracSec`, did you mean function `fracSec`?
.dub/packages/sdlang-d-0.10.4/sdlang-d/src/sdlang/token.d(49,18): Error: 
undefined identifier `FracSec`, did you mean function `fracSec`?
ldc2 failed with exit code 1.
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:23: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lix
Source-Version: 0.9.29-1.1
Done: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lix, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 961...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org> (supplier of updated lix 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:11:32 +0200
Source: lix
Binary: lix lix-data
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.29-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Games Team <pkg-games-de...@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org>
Description:
 lix        - Puzzle game inspired by Lemmings
 lix-data   - Puzzle game inspired by Lemmings
Closes: 961986
Changes:
 lix (0.9.29-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
 .
   [ Peter Michael Green <plugw...@raspbian.org> ]
   * Add patch from upstream pull request to fix build with new libphobos
     (Closes: 961986)
Checksums-Sha1:
 306c8c1a216542da1316dac286d2b6cd3e13d555 2027 lix_0.9.29-1.1.dsc
 6a78c8e83471b617c5f7a16b0c680e7b02ee4091 81048 lix_0.9.29-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 e1b1232693bee261535c85e83dc98e03cae682d7 7197 lix_0.9.29-1.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 eb5a1232906b6bf258cac9091a0dc422f3c66d097444a73cd5476200634ea8d8 2027 
lix_0.9.29-1.1.dsc
 17580cdc6465327d333da2cbe4a77e61db34edccc8d480a95655ec122c63f2fa 81048 
lix_0.9.29-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 ef1ee08d3485fc826a39de6b3d4db4ecede5c7a76dbefa7bf6f2a7afb9af1d9f 7197 
lix_0.9.29-1.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 5811a275d2478c8d922789d12fd8b4ea 2027 games optional lix_0.9.29-1.1.dsc
 49a2045d227ca86bcfc545cad1f22c17 81048 games optional 
lix_0.9.29-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 e1fc4b5e756ac40ba107c69575c36b85 7197 games optional 
lix_0.9.29-1.1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2kJg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to