Hi, Il 09/06/20 17:06, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > For avoiding similar problems for people upgrading from buster, > it would be good if for both 1.71 and whatever version of Boost > will be released in Buster the library packages will add a Breaks: > on the corresponding libboost-*1.67.0 package.
No problems in line of principle, but I am not sure I understand what would this solve: the conflict between two different versions of Boost arises when the same executable links against both (through different dependencies). There is no problem in having both versions installed at the same time. So, given that we have to make sure that bullseye packages link only against 1.71 (or whatever it will be, but just one version), what is to be gained by having the Break: indication? Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com> Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
