-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Dear all,
I have create a RFH since I have currently no time due to personal issue s: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963191 I hope somebody can help with the maintaining. Best, Jan Am 26.05.20 um 16:33 schrieb Jan Luca Naumann: > Dear Peter, > > I am in general still active but due to private stuff I was quite > bad maintaining aufs the last months, I am really sorry. I will try > to take a look into the package at the weekend. Additionally, I > will create a RFH bug, maybe somebody wants to help me so there is > no single point of failure in the future. > > Best, Jan > > On 26.05.20 15:18, peter green wrote: >> The aufs package last saw a maintainer upload in September 2019 >> and was last-updated (by a NMU) in October 2019. It has had >> broken build-dependencies in testing for half a year now (since >> Linux 5.3.9-3 migrated to testing in November 2019). >> >> According to dak rm the aufs source-package has two >> reverse-dependencies, aufs-tools and fsprotect neither of which >> has any reverse-dependencies. >> >> Adrian filed a rc bug in November 2019 which received no >> maintainer response, however the package was not autoremoved from >> testing due to aufs and aufs-tools being considered a "key >> packages" due to high popcon. This popcon actually seems to be >> growing in both absolute and percentage terms. I presume the high >> popcon is due to some deriviative (hence debian-derivatives and >> debian-live in cc) using aufs in their live image builds (as far >> as I can tell debian's own live images seem to use overlayfs >> instead nowadays). >> >> aufs does seem to still be maintained upstream with upstream >> claiming support for Linux 5.6. >> >> According to contributors.debian.net Jan Luca Naumann (the aufs >> maintainer) was last active in September 2019. Jan: are you >> still around? and if so do you still intend to maintain the aufs >> package? if not is someone else going to step up to the plate? or >> should these packages be removed from testing? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEwNbeTg2NJIWRcwSlfhHX8Rn5cbsFAl7t5xkACgkQfhHX8Rn5 cbtQIRAAoOQXpteSVFE/ssF81zS80AqOTSTCjLzh76oXc7/az6eHUZpdVrNkPqd/ Cbz+iZiO2NDdpfw0APPA3bKoC9s9R+J9EpOxx7zS5eb87R7xJDAvTk5oskHl8lYH V2oXcZvai8Rzf+l+sLKG2k3c4WRuoli/QxLZP8TnE0ySVqmtYOZCUUSeCRYwjLed qAT6vW/5mgCaIIynZMXwYNW5889h8AVIt+n9WOHYCYEtltRTDkJU+n6ZpNx2VhbE HdDS98T/RWhwNq2oZEIkQlfZfYp7yNP0MtThvCnPRML1dSZwuMTLd4/nrNaL3ITK MBjt0/IZ6wlp1E18kePfpaHFLX7ekqhBqTr5PmCiQzyPorcgCaEq6rTkwfReuLWR g58wQmx/8GkrYh4HcCziETSoODGscicskBkzipk6yT9lA9JDROFMqnu8mudUc5B5 /VocELuPiQaEql4h1G/tkoZ/KSkZterDFZ72ssYoYzLgJQxLLY1wSlVKovtKaMcX 5kJ3dzHjmjEO1IRfpbPyFJ5HaFlfTHAbkXx3Ll5saz08KiX+isHr6JGU+ZEt4O3R P4+rc8Z+gjTURY/2xHo8XRvehEyuoRYfHDaXOmR3a7pazt6e4TZ0bR1uyOsbJWhy StTmrl72U6dTEXk20IhJdMlG1pp7I0aMfoW85nl182TJwnhxFWc= =W+Dn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----