Your message dated Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:58:56 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <pine.bsm.4.64l.2007152358180.6...@herc.mirbsd.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#965086: ssh: setgroups: Bad address [preauth]
has caused the Debian Bug report #965087,
regarding postfix/master[2632]: fatal: set_eugid: setgroups(137): Bad address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
965087: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965087
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: postfix
Version: 3.5.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

After a glibc upgrade today, I cannot start postfix any more.
I first noticed that after reportbug syslog was strangely quiet,
and sudo mailq does say:

postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly

Trying to start Postfix results in:

Jul 15 22:40:24 tglase postfix/master[2632]: fatal: set_eugid: setgroups(137): 
Bad address

This may be related to the setgroups fatal failure I’m reporting
against OpenSSH :/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unreleased
  APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), 
(100, 'experimental')
Architecture: x32 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, amd64

Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages postfix depends on:
ii  adduser                3.118
ii  cpio                   2.13+dfsg-3
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.74
ii  dpkg                   1.20.5
ii  e2fsprogs              1.45.6-1
ii  libc6                  2.31-1
ii  libdb5.3               5.3.28+dfsg1-0.6
ii  libicu67               67.1-3
ii  libsasl2-2             2.1.27+dfsg-2
ii  libssl1.1              1.1.1g-1
ii  lsb-base               11.1.0
ii  netbase                6.1
ii  ssl-cert               1.0.39

Versions of packages postfix recommends:
ii  ca-bundle [ca-certificates]  20190604
ii  python3                      3.8.2-3

Versions of packages postfix suggests:
ii  bsd-mailx [mail-reader]  8.1.2-0.20180807cvs-1
ii  libsasl2-modules         2.1.27+dfsg-2
pn  postfix-cdb              <none>
pn  postfix-doc              <none>
pn  postfix-ldap             <none>
pn  postfix-lmdb             <none>
pn  postfix-mysql            <none>
pn  postfix-pcre             <none>
pn  postfix-pgsql            <none>
pn  postfix-sqlite           <none>
pn  procmail                 <none>
pn  resolvconf               <none>
pn  ufw                      <none>

-- debconf information:
  postfix/procmail: false
  postfix/root_address:
  postfix/chattr: false
  postfix/destinations: tglase.lan.tarent.de, tglase.lan.tarent.de, 
localhost.lan.tarent.de, localhost
  postfix/main_cf_conversion_warning: true
  postfix/not_configured:
  postfix/compat_conversion_warning: true
  postfix/dynamicmaps_conversion_warning:
  postfix/protocols: all
  postfix/retry_upgrade_warning:
* postfix/mailname: tglase.lan.tarent.de
  postfix/kernel_version_warning:
  postfix/rfc1035_violation: false
  postfix/mynetworks: 127.0.0.0/8 [::ffff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128
  postfix/tlsmgr_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/sqlite_warning:
  postfix/newaliases: false
* postfix/main_mailer_type: Internet with smarthost
  postfix/bad_recipient_delimiter:
* postfix/relayhost: mail.lixid.net
  postfix/mailbox_limit: 0
  postfix/recipient_delim: +
  postfix/mydomain_warning:
  postfix/relay_restrictions_warning:
  postfix/lmtp_retired_warning: true

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Colin Watson dixit:

>OK, thanks.  I see you opened #965091, so it should be able to continue
>there.

Indeed. Same for the other bugreport, closing here.
These were merely symptoms.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
18:47⎜<mirabilos:#!/bin/mksh> well channels… you see, I see everything in the
same window anyway      18:48⎜<xpt:#!/bin/mksh> i know, you have some kind of
telnet with automatic pong         18:48⎜<mirabilos:#!/bin/mksh> haha, yes :D
18:49⎜<mirabilos:#!/bin/mksh> though that's more tinyirc – sirc is more comfy

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to