This is probably a result of a new GCC version. C++ symbols can be painful to manage. This will be trivial to update the next time I update the package.
Scott K On August 3, 2020 9:15:16 AM UTC, Szczepan Zalega | Nitrokey <szcze...@nitrokey.com> wrote: >On 8/3/20 10:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> (optional=templinst|arch=!amd64 !arm64 !x32) >> (optional=templinst) > >Hi! > >As far as I see the problem comes from the listing format difference, >not the actual symbol change. > >E.g.: >``` >- (optional=templinst|arch=!amd64 !arm64 >!x32)_ZN8nitrokey5proto17ResponseDissectorILNS0_9CommandIDE65ERKNS0_14DeviceResponseILS2_65ENS0_12EmptyPayloadEEEE24status_translate_commandB5cxx11Ei@Base >3.5 >+ >(optional=templinst)_ZN8nitrokey5proto17ResponseDissectorILNS0_9CommandIDE65ERKNS0_14DeviceResponseILS2_65ENS0_12EmptyPayloadEEEE24status_translate_commandB5cxx11Ei@Base >3.5 >```
