Control: tag -1 reopen Greetings,
Étienne Mollier, on 2020-09-08 21:10:18 +0200: > Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-09-07 21:55:45 -0400: > > Étienne Mollier <etienne.moll...@mailoo.org> writes: > > > Thanks for your work on this topic. I attempted to remove the > > > patches to address #960756 in Biopython. While the problem is > > > fixed on i386 without having to fall back on version 4, I hit a > > > very similar issue on amd64 this time. > > > > Oops, I accidentally introduced a regression on 64-bit architectures; > > fixed in -3 just now. (An intended formal clarification misfired.) > > No problem, I have done my fair share of oopses here and there, > that could happen to anybody. I confirm I haven't seen the bug > reappear on amd64 or i386 with the new version. The patch for > working the test around could now be safely dropped. > > > Thank you very much for pointing it out! > > You're most welcome, glad you could solve it so quickly! > > Have a nice day, :) While running the testsuite of the python-biopython package impending update, I noticed the autopkgtest set back to do the run with `makeblastdb -version 5` failed in arm64, so the regression looks still there in version 2.10.0-3, at least on arm64 architecture. This issue doesn't seem caught by the test suite of ncbi-blast+, so it might be worth adding this test. In the meanwhile, I wrapped up a small patch for the python-biopython test suite to fall back to version 4 on a selection of architectures. Thanks, -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.moll...@mailoo.org> Old rsa/3072: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d New rsa/4096: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/8, please excuse my verbosity.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
