Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:03:28 +0000
with message-id <e1kxmz2-0000r0...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#972971: fixed in atlas-ecmwf 0.22.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #972971,
regarding atlas-ecmwf FTBFS on 32bit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
972971: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: atlas-ecmwf
Version: 0.22.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=atlas-ecmwf&suite=sid

...
[ 58%] Building Fortran object 
src/atlas_f/CMakeFiles/atlas_ecmwf_f.dir/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90.o
cd /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-i686-linux-gnu/src/atlas_f && /usr/bin/gfortran 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Datlas_ecmwf_f_EXPORTS -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src 
-I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-i686-linux-gnu/src 
-I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-i686-linux-gnu/src/atlas_f 
-I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-i686-linux-gnu/module -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/atlas_f 
-I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu -I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/eckit 
-I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/eckit/geometry 
-I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/eckit/linalg 
-I/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/openmpi/include/openmpi 
-I/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/openmpi/include 
-I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/eckit/mpi 
-I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/eckit/option -I/usr/include/eigen3 
-I/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/fortran/gfortran-10/fckit 
-I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/fckit -g -O2 
-fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
-I/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/fortran/i686-linux-gnu-gfortran-10 -O3 -DNDEBUG 
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions -J../../module -fPIC -fopenmp -c 
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/atlas_f/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90 -o 
CMakeFiles/atlas_ecmwf_f.dir/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90.o
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/atlas_f/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90:118:45:

  118 | subroutine atlas_allocate_managedmem_int32_r2( A, dims )
      |                                             1
......
  132 | subroutine atlas_allocate_managedmem_int64_r2_int32( A, dims )
      |                                                   2
Error: Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface 'atlas_allocate_managedmem' 
for ‘atlas_allocate_managedmem_int32_r2’ at (1) and 
‘atlas_allocate_managedmem_int64_r2_int32’ at (2)
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/atlas_f/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90:278:47:

  278 | subroutine atlas_deallocate_managedmem_int32_r2( A )
      |                                               1
......
  286 | subroutine atlas_deallocate_managedmem_int64_r2( A )
      |                                               2
Error: Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface 'atlas_deallocate_managedmem' 
for ‘atlas_deallocate_managedmem_int32_r2’ at (1) and 
‘atlas_deallocate_managedmem_int64_r2’ at (2)
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/atlas_f/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90:290:37:

  290 |   call atlas__deallocate_managedmem( c_loc_int64(A(1,1)) )
      |                                     1
Error: Type mismatch in argument ‘x’ at (1); passed INTEGER(4) to INTEGER(8)
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/atlas_f/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90:258:37:

  258 |   call atlas__deallocate_managedmem( c_loc_int64(A(1)) )
      |                                     1
Error: Type mismatch in argument ‘x’ at (1); passed INTEGER(4) to INTEGER(8)
make[3]: *** [src/atlas_f/CMakeFiles/atlas_ecmwf_f.dir/build.make:1061: 
src/atlas_f/CMakeFiles/atlas_ecmwf_f.dir/util/atlas_allocate_module.F90.o] 
Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: atlas-ecmwf
Source-Version: 0.22.0-5
Done: Alastair McKinstry <mckins...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
atlas-ecmwf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 972...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alastair McKinstry <mckins...@debian.org> (supplier of updated atlas-ecmwf 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:26:53 +0000
Source: atlas-ecmwf
Architecture: source
Version: 0.22.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry <mckins...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry <mckins...@debian.org>
Closes: 972971
Changes:
 atlas-ecmwf (0.22.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add dep. on libfckit-dev to libatlas-ecmwd-dev
   * Supply fortran interface on 64-bit systems only. Closes: #972971
Checksums-Sha1:
 aa1e1c5e2385e5f78984bb8355f2c4505c032688 2421 atlas-ecmwf_0.22.0-5.dsc
 fb1040ac758e7d4f231590b2a8feeb2b8ffcd4ff 11028 
atlas-ecmwf_0.22.0-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 0daf4aacd1b4b8a64fcd5429cd36893c3a5ade0c0f27a831c171c768192be61c 2421 
atlas-ecmwf_0.22.0-5.dsc
 27bf6ef748e94c7d984a82098c78a749b67e3137ecfdfc2ef877f87475931326 11028 
atlas-ecmwf_0.22.0-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 d4c2826e712f4e6853731699306b3472 2421 science optional atlas-ecmwf_0.22.0-5.dsc
 d8915563900066289b9c56986363d0fe 11028 science optional 
atlas-ecmwf_0.22.0-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ResP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to