On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:01:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:52:07PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > Hi Debian-Med, hi Steffen: > > > > I grabbed this bug to fix the QPainterPath include and noticed that > > packaging of 36.0 is underway on the master branch. I have updated the > > debian/patches to apply against this new upstream version and the > > package is building for me locally. That commit has been pushed. > > > > However, I noticed that Steffen listed a TODO in the changelog: > > > > > * TODO: package new runtime dependencies: clark, wevote > > > > Should I also create a branch for 34.0 to fix the FTBFS bug and upload? Or > > will that just create noise - i.e., should I wait on the new runtime > > deps for 36.0? > > I think fixing the FTBFS is valuable in any case. However, may be > chacking the effort the new packages clark and wevote might make is > sensible since we would love to deliver the latest version of our > packages at freeze time so the goal to provide those new dependencies is > set anyway.
Since it was quick enough to fix the Qt issuse, I went ahead and built a 34.0+dfsg-2 package and pushed a 34.0+dfsg branch and the corresponding debian/34.0+dfsg-2 tag to the Salsa repo. Cheers, tony