Your message dated Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:48:34 +0000
with message-id <e1kly9c-0002jb...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#976492: fixed in bochs 2.6.11+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #976492,
regarding bochs: FTBFS on arm64: ld: cannot represent machine `i386'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
976492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bochs
Version: 2.6.11+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on arm64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/bios'
> cc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o 
> biossums.o biossums.c
> cc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now  biossums.o   -o biossums
> i686-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-stack-protector "-DBIOS_BUILD_DATE=\"`date -u -d ' 
> Sun Jan  5 08:36:00 CET 2020' '+%m/%d/%y'`\"" -E -P rombios.c > _rombios_.c
> bcc -o rombios.s -C-c -D__i86__ -0 -S _rombios_.c
> sed -e 's/^\.text//' -e 's/^\.data//' rombios.s > _rombios_.s
> as86 _rombios_.s -b tmp.bin -u- -w- -g -0 -j -O -l rombios.txt
> perl ./makesym.perl < rombios.txt > rombios.sym
> mv tmp.bin rombios16.bin
> ./biossums rombios16.bin
> 
> 
> PCI-Bios header at: 0x9620
> Current checksum:     0x07
> Calculated checksum:  0x07  
> 
> 
> $PIR header at:     0x99D0
> Current checksum:     0x37
> Calculated checksum:  0x37  
> 
> 
> $PnP header at:     0x9BB0
> Current checksum:     0xD1
> Calculated checksum:  0xB1  Setting checksum.
> 
> 
> Bios checksum at:   0xFFFF
> Current checksum:     0x00
> Calculated checksum:  0x15  Setting checksum.
> rm -f  _rombios_.s
> i686-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-stack-protector -c -o rombios32start.o 
> rombios32start.S
> cpp -P acpi-dsdt.dsl acpi-dsdt.dsl.i
> iasl -tc -p acpi-dsdt.hex acpi-dsdt.dsl.i
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i     19:         Device(PCI0) {
> Warning  3073 -           Multiple types ^  (Device object requires either a 
> _HID or _ADR, but not both)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    157:                 Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                                   ^ Control Method should be 
> made Serialized due to creation of named objects within 
> (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.KBD._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    159:                      Name (TMP, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                                     ^ Creation of named 
> objects within a method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local 
> variables instead (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.KBD._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    186:                 Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                                   ^ Control Method should be 
> made Serialized due to creation of named objects within 
> (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.MOU._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    188:                     Name (TMP, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                                    ^ Creation of named 
> objects within a method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local 
> variables instead (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.MOU._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    202:   Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                     ^ Control Method should be made 
> Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.FDC0._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    204:       Name (BUF0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                       ^ Creation of named objects within a 
> method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local variables instead 
> (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.FDC0._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    230:   Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                     ^ Control Method should be made 
> Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.LPT._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    232:       Name (BUF0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                       ^ Creation of named objects within a 
> method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local variables instead 
> (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.LPT._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    257:   Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                     ^ Control Method should be made 
> Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.COM1._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    259:       Name (BUF0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                       ^ Creation of named objects within a 
> method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local variables instead 
> (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.COM1._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    284:   Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                     ^ Control Method should be made 
> Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.COM2._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    286:       Name (BUF0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                       ^ Creation of named objects within a 
> method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local variables instead 
> (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.COM2._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    330:                     If (And (0x80, PRQ0, Local1))
> Warning  3144 -                   Method Local is set but never used ^  
> (Local1)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    340:                 Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                                   ^ Control Method should be 
> made Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.LNKA._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    342:                     Name (PRR0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                                     ^ Creation of named 
> objects within a method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local 
> variables instead (\_SB.LNKA._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    377:                     If (And (0x80, PRQ1, Local1))
> Warning  3144 -                   Method Local is set but never used ^  
> (Local1)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    387:                 Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                                   ^ Control Method should be 
> made Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.LNKB._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    389:                     Name (PRR0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                                     ^ Creation of named 
> objects within a method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local 
> variables instead (\_SB.LNKB._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    424:                     If (And (0x80, PRQ2, Local1))
> Warning  3144 -                   Method Local is set but never used ^  
> (Local1)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    434:                 Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                                   ^ Control Method should be 
> made Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.LNKC._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    436:                     Name (PRR0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                                     ^ Creation of named 
> objects within a method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local 
> variables instead (\_SB.LNKC._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    471:                     If (And (0x80, PRQ3, Local1))
> Warning  3144 -                   Method Local is set but never used ^  
> (Local1)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    481:                 Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> Remark   2120 -                                   ^ Control Method should be 
> made Serialized due to creation of named objects within (\_SB.LNKD._CRS)
> 
> acpi-dsdt.dsl.i    483:                     Name (PRR0, ResourceTemplate ()
> Remark   2173 -                                     ^ Creation of named 
> objects within a method is highly inefficient, use globals or method local 
> variables instead (\_SB.LNKD._CRS)
> 
> 
> Intel ACPI Component Architecture
> ASL+ Optimizing Compiler/Disassembler version 20200925
> Copyright (c) 2000 - 2020 Intel Corporation
> 
> ASL Input:     acpi-dsdt.dsl.i -   19676 bytes    210 keywords    532 source 
> lines
> AML Output:    acpi-dsdt.aml -    3640 bytes     98 opcodes     112 named 
> objects
> Hex Dump:      acpi-dsdt.hex -   34535 bytes
> 
> Compilation successful. 0 Errors, 5 Warnings, 20 Remarks, 226 Optimizations
> rm acpi-dsdt.dsl.i
> sed -i -e's/^unsigned/const 
> unsigned/;s/ACPI-DSDT_HEX/ACPI_DSDT_HEX/g;s/acpi-dsdt_aml_code/AmlCode/g' 
> acpi-dsdt.hex
> i686-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-stack-protector -O2 -Wall -c -o rombios32.o 
> rombios32.c
> rombios32.c: In function ‘setup_mtrr’:
> rombios32.c:484:23: warning: variable ‘wc’ set but not used 
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>   484 |     int i, vcnt, fix, wc;
>       |                       ^~
> rombios32.c: In function ‘smbios_init’:
> rombios32.c:2201:30: warning: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing 
> between 1 and 6 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-truncation=]
>  2201 |     snprintf(start, 8, "DIMM %d", instance);
>       |                              ^~
> rombios32.c:2201:24: note: directive argument in the range [0, 131070]
>  2201 |     snprintf(start, 8, "DIMM %d", instance);
>       |                        ^~~~~~~~~
> rombios32.c:2201:5: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 7 and 12 bytes into a 
> destination of size 8
>  2201 |     snprintf(start, 8, "DIMM %d", instance);
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ld -o rombios32.out -T ./rombios32.ld rombios32start.o rombios32.o
> ld: cannot represent machine `i386'
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:114: rombios32.out] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/05/bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bochs
Source-Version: 2.6.11+dfsg-4
Done: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bochs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 976...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> (supplier of updated bochs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:36:40 +0100
Source: bochs
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.11+dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Closes: 976492
Changes:
 bochs (2.6.11+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Use cross-binutils tools when building rombios32.
     Closes: #976492.
   * Standards-Version 4.5.1, no change required.
   * Switch to debhelper compatibility level 13.
Checksums-Sha1:
 de332734f18254466204a2628bc6c2814e90ce79 2603 bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4.dsc
 56e5a2edaff88bfd67455ee489c3e1302be68b8c 36888 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 7c71376e7b4109897e84a3af4b1a26b1acc19b60 16309 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 4d0bd8e6a8f83d673c39b6b1e52efc4d92da4dfd49b7707773a8c95f1923ffed 2603 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4.dsc
 5f88eecfd243acd60113fc08ccc9979ca972d79c61b70c11a57157b54e7daff6 36888 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 c139fadd07d5583e15abf8217b33ef544441715914d83ed8c38334bfd89744e8 16309 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 99539ee5dc8b5e931b8a8c8301bf35fe 2603 otherosfs optional 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4.dsc
 4b02c095bb5df476f3b5fca7612c0176 36888 otherosfs optional 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 e66cb92949b8a7bb048c13d2d2fcdea6 16309 otherosfs optional 
bochs_2.6.11+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEnPVX/hPLkMoq7x0ggNMC9Yhtg5wFAl/NFrgACgkQgNMC9Yht
g5xhUg/+M8ts3v2vmaaXlxZDPwBXerk/GILK1fK/NHRp+2rtFopiuoui9VgY378i
r1iiw6Hfcaf+V55v4GQTouv2IgzzOu9TO7eHtOA+T9X7PPxm7Y1+0LA71eSOMhqv
vSNEu69uoSsdeFfa/s+ff+lNCYUzUNLD+FiDOJkBkV/Qnq41Q3ExZMCG0ziTuato
t/zjqRt2gSDFKHePDIWMDfK1XpD30/F8v5drMQ3FE6ICuY/n0y/JjsVy1VwkqUcM
bjTHX64agwLPUxz/LVjxKJpOphh3wMmy7QAtbu+HAfIiAtolFbv4OnnvwLhipGYH
LM++TyHHST8hfrup04k7bZJsflvi0wV/5M6YEHspOQncyApYfndb8nyQKQTDMmai
ozxh5se61Vbrg+5k/Eh1Nalp+rJkjzUWeEQWI658Pmn5lfs3nHPZxlZmL9Txvc5O
rLO5xf+tf9cCMckg6WR7M0dTPUygnzHyC0SBcRdnXyGWu0UGxYHmXiTzPl5K9kEM
wHqqukUG/62NW0G4iMmmrXgLiG7ATrMFoT/1qTRrO4aFLjQudUCC7S67y95WRqsw
IOJmZDtJhv8mioTz9GxCKCHpQQ0lw6kpLZYESj4SM7J8Z8wTVs5vqyR9xAcoZ/H2
busUPSJcPgy2MRg5U81wVEHfLXQXMQGB2XBJf5aXOuxaCD4Waug=
=iC1F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to