Control: tag -1 confirmed Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes:
> Source: notmuch > Version: 0.31.2-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64. > > I'm marking this bug as severity:serious since your package currently has > ppc64el binary packages in unstable (so this is a regression). Thanks for the report. It looks like it is some combination of an arch all build, and fairly high degree of parlellism in the build. I only managed to duplicate it on plummer with -j32. For future runs it would be great if the sbuild flags could be in the actual bug report (it took me a while to realize you were doing sbuild -A), and if possible the amount of parallelism (parallel=whatever, or equivalent). d
