On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:41:34 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > Source: service-wrapper-java > Version: 3.5.30-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64.
In this case I believe the RC severity is correct because the arch:any or jni version of the package FTBFS on ppc64el. We should try to fix the problem on ppc64el or, if upstream doesn't support ppc64el, remove the architecture from the list of supported architectures in debian/control. Markus
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
