On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:26:09 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:01:49 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote: > > > The image files don't include anything that > > > resembles source, but I'm choosing to assume that DFSG #2 doesn't > > > apply to images as long as they are being distributed legally and > > > with permission. I'm not planning on complaining on that basis, > > > IOW. > > > > What makes you think that distributing images in main without source > > is *not* a violation of Debian SC? > > I didn't say I didn't think it was a violation; it seems to me that > a > strict reading of the DFSG does require source for images (those image > that have a meaningful "source" image). I said that I, personally, > wasn't planning on making any kind of stink about images being > distributed without source, as long as they're being distributed > legally and in a way that the author is comfortable with.
Since you already got in touch with the relevant copyright holders,
could you please clarify which images are currently shipped in
blackbox-themes without source?
I mean:
* some of the images may be source themselves (because they are in the
form that is used in the theme and in the preferred form for making
modifications at the same time): this images are OK (as long as they are
licensed in a DFSG-free manner, of course)
* the other images (if any) are generated from some other form (which is
the preferred form for making modifications, that is to say, is source)
Could you please list the images that fall in the second set, but are
distributed without source?
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpeVxqjT5K5T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
