Hi Thomas On 2020-12-31 13:06:37 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I'm challenging the fact that a circular dependency is a problem for > arch:all packages. At least, it shouldn't be an RC bug, IMO.
If packages cannot be built on the buildds, they are RC-buggy. > > If the problem is bootstraping (which isn't a problem, since that's > arch:all), then a wishlist bug against requests so that it implements > the "nodoc" build profile is probably a better way to go. > > Please downgrade the severity. That would be wrong. See https://release.debian.org/bullseye/rc_policy.txt > I also don't understand why you've renamed the original bug, which seems > to be very different from the circular dependency you're describing. Can > you explain why they are related, and why we shouldn't have 2 bugs? The bug is that a build of requests is missing. The version that fixes the uninstallability of python3-requests was already uploaded. Cheers > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
