On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:15:52 +0100 Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > severity 975030 serious > severity 974997 serious > severity 974996 serious > severity 974995 serious > severity 974994 serious > severity 974993 serious > thanks > > It was suggested to me on IRC that the severity of this could be > serious because the build-dependency libidn2-0-dev is going to be > removed from Debian. I'm volunteering to do NMU these packages to fix > the bug, and could look into that in a couple of weeks -- if you give > me permission to do it before, I'd start directly. If I'm mistaken > that this is not a valid justification for a serious bug, downgrade the > bug and let me know, as I'm not sure what the best way to get an > obsolete deprecated transition package removed from Debian when build- > deps remain. > > /Simon >
Hi, looking at the RC bugs list I stumbled across this one and added a merge request on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/curl/-/merge_requests/9 Cheers, Bruno
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
