Quoting Samuel Thibault (2021-03-08 16:12:37) > Gürkan Myczko, le lun. 08 mars 2021 15:44:52 +0100, a ecrit: > > Package: otf-trace > > Version: 1.12.5+dfsg-7 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Sounds like a serious violation of ?10.1 > > Well, yes. The base issue is that OTF stands both for OpenType Font > and Open Trace Format. Thus the marked "Conflicts". > > The question is who should "own" the otfinfo command name?
Do you mean if the package already owning it is ok giving it up? > Packages names are not really a concern, I was fine with using > libopen-trace-format-dev along the existing libotf-dev. > > But command names are really a concern since that's what > documentations, tutorials, etc. found on internet will say: "run > otfinfo", and making Debian systems deviate from that will confuse > users, be it for one side or the other side. > > (and the probability that somebody works both on OpenType Font and > Open Trace Format on the same machine is quite low). I thought similarly about a clash between a JavaScript interpreter and a ham routing daemon, but turned out the rules are quite strict: See bug#681360 about node. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
