On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:42:10 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > gregor herrmann, on 2021-04-21 17:32:18 +0200: > > In case someone has the time, a second pair of eyes on the prepared > > fix for #987095 would be welcome. > > I've been looking at rdepends and build-rdeps of libgraph-perl, > and they are mostly building and autopkgtesting without any > issues related to the change brought by your patch, derived from > upstream.
Thank you, much appreciated! > The only problem I caught is libchado-perl autopkgtest. The > package does not declare any Testsuite, and the d/rules test > target is skipped, due to needing a database access. But if I > trigger an autopkgtest, then the autodep8 starts, and chokes on > a couple of issues. I'm not too sure whether this is blocking, > but if so, will need to ping Debian Med. Hm … Good question. And it raises some questions :) - Do the problems happen with the libgraph-perl version in stable and testing/unstable as well? - What did you do to run which tests? (I stared at the package bit but it's not really obvious to me). - Which tests fail how? (I only see ./t/01_okay.t which triest to load Bio::Chado::LoadDBI which doesn't exist anywhere in Debian ?!) - Does this package actually use modules from libgraph-perl? (Grepping show some Bio::Graphics stuff but libbio-graphics-perl doesn't depend on libgraph-perl.) - Do you have any output or any other details? Cheers, gregor, cc'ing the bug report -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Beatles
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
