Michael Biebl: > Hi Niels > > Am 31.08.21 um 18:07 schrieb Niels Thykier: > >> My thought is that this is not something I want in dh_link - dh_link has >> no business second guessing the link values it gets. Since dh_link runs >> after dh_installsystemd, then we cannot even rely on dh_installsystemd >> to perform a fix up either. > > Nod. > >> Which begins to smell like that either people have to update their >> dh_links calls/configuration OR we roll back the dh_installsystemd >> change to move to /usr. I am not particular fan of either. :-/ >> >> Nevertheless, I am inclined to do a rollback and then punt on the "/ -> >> /usr" migration track for now. > > I'll see if I can compile a list of possibly affected packages. > If the number is low enough, I think updating the symlink manually is > probably ok. > > Regards, > Michael > >
I appreciate it, but I think we should be careful here with the manual update. If consensus on debian-devel is that debhelper should roll this back, then we will break these packages again. I do not think that would make us popular... :-/ ~Niels
