Hi Étienne, all, > I took the liberty to implement the change you suggest, and push > to Salsa [1].
I do not see your changes on salsa, the last commit is 3 months old there. Did you forget to push? > Since this is an RC bug which propagates on > several packages, and since it would have to go through NEW, for > manual review; Actually, this bug is now triggering an ugly autorm on several packages. And since it needs to travel via NEW, they might end up getting removed from testing. @Andrius, since you wrote: > So far, there has not been other libcifppX binary package, thus no > damage is done. However, future libcifppX packages should not contain > static files, in particular these: and since this is not doing any damage for now, do you think we could reduce the severity to important for now? We cannot do another upload on top of the one we will be sending to NEW w/o hooping via NEW again, anyway, so I find it safe to drop the severity for now. Let me know? Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
