> Thanks for the examples. However I can't reproduce your results. > With the standard gerbv from etch, my result looks identical to your > GTK+ 2.0 result.
My screenshot with GTK+ 2.0 version of gerbv (from etch tree) shows *incorrect* result of GERBER interpretation! Maybe you mean that "my result looks identical to your GTK+ 1.2 result"? > > I tested in unstable(sid) on both i386 and amd64 architectures. > I have recent clean etch snapshot. Both gerbv versions in etch and sid are identical. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
