On 2021-10-01 14:31:57 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-10-01 14:26:02 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2021-10-01 14:17:53 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > In my archives, I can see that the issue occurred with > > > ghostscript 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1, but 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u4 > > > isn't affected on my second testcase. > > > > The following PDF file (on which I got the issue with > > ghostscript 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1) may be a useful testcase: > > > > https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02001080v1/document > > On this testcase, the issue is actually reproducible with > ghostscript 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u4!
It seems that the issue partly comes from pdflatex: On an old file for which ps2pdf was correct with ghostscript 9.53.3~dfsg-4, it is now incorrect still with ghostscript 9.53.3~dfsg-4. But if I regenerate the intermediate PDF file on an old Debian machine and transfer it to my current machine, ps2pdf is correct with ghostscript 9.53.3~dfsg-4 and with ghostscript 9.53.3~dfsg-7 (stable), and also with ghostscript 9.54.0~dfsg-5. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)