John Brooks wrote: > I don't know precisely what criteria of stability and quality are used > to judge whether a package is suitable for inclusion; my outside view > is that this package is no more broken or unmaintained than the > average Debian package.
Esp. when compared to dirvish (see my previous mail), which is unmaintained for 16+ years, but still available in bullseye. What's the point in keeping that one while at the same time removing rsnapshot, which is unmaintained for just a handful of months now? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinri...@altum.de> Matrix-Adresse: @heini:chat.altum.de GPG Public Key: 80F1540E03A3968F3D79C382853C32C427B48049 Privacy Handbuch: https://www.privacy-handbuch.de
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
