Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:48:43 +0000
with message-id <e1mdb1p-000ctt...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#996711: fixed in cglm 0.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #996711,
regarding src:cglm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386 and 
s390x
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
996711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cglm
Version: 0.7.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your package src:cglm has been trying to migrate for 64
days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. The current version FTBFS on i386
and s390x.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so it doesn't
affect (old-)stable.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg00005.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cglm


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cglm
Source-Version: 0.8.4-2
Done: Leon Marz <m...@lmarz.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cglm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 996...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Leon Marz <m...@lmarz.org> (supplier of updated cglm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:19:00 +0200
Source: cglm
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Leon Marz <m...@lmarz.org>
Changed-By: Leon Marz <m...@lmarz.org>
Closes: 996711
Changes:
 cglm (0.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add clamp_rounding.patch (Closes: #996711)
Checksums-Sha1:
 9fed718bad69bd6ad63eb81307d399fd38420b16 1981 cglm_0.8.4-2.dsc
 084e53540a17aa7e41a0bd0146006f792d80f02d 5476 cglm_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 31a914f781a76d9d25572514c0f9461134eda3140e61800c4b6b2203704b3a88 1981 
cglm_0.8.4-2.dsc
 85bc7734c398f08f0264e95c1d585dffecd8be95074f50857152b9f35f82e33c 5476 
cglm_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 df21568bfedaaef070c08d8a6fdf35db 1981 libs optional cglm_0.8.4-2.dsc
 1222698ea6e93c616d68d81ba26ce272 5476 libs optional cglm_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0atb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to