Source: openvdb Version: 8.1.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' > LD_PRELOAD= LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu help2man > --version-string=8.1.0 --include=debian/vdb_print.1.in > --output=debian/vdb_print.1 --no-info --no-discard-stderr > ./debian/tmp/usr/bin/vdb_print > LD_PRELOAD= LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu help2man > --version-string=8.1.0 --include=debian/vdb_view.1.in > --output=debian/vdb_view.1 --no-info --no-discard-stderr > ./debian/tmp/usr/bin/vdb_view > help2man: can't get `--help' info from ./debian/tmp/usr/bin/vdb_view > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:127: debian/vdb_view.1] Error 255 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/openvdb_8.1.0-3_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
