Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@debian.org> writes: > Hi all! > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Source: nose >> Version: 1.3.7-7 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: FTBFS >> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs >> User: lu...@debian.org >> Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm >> >> Hi, >> >> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build >> on amd64. >> >> [...] [snip] > Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> > elpy (U) >
Please ignore Elpy for now, because it's RC for other reasons, eg: Python 3.9 broke it, the upstream maintainer has RSI, and I don't think that it will be fixed anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope for a the maintainer's recover and/or a new upstream maintainer, but failing this, users will migrate to an LSP-based solution--they're already migrating. Regards, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
