Hi, On 01-03-2022 12:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
This "fix" suggest there may be more breakage, normally the Release Team would schedule binNMU's. Can you please elaborate how ABI is normally maintained within swi-prolog, such that the rebuilds can be detected and requested? I fail to see how in the case of logol and swi-prolog the right versions are chosen. In other words, I think the "fixed" logol can migrate to testing even if swi-prolog does not and will be broken in testing until swi-prolog can migrate. Normally *versioned* dependencies should prevent this.
I just read the backlog of the bug report (by default, submitters of bug reports in Debian don't get notified of messages, I missed the discussion). It seems my worry was already raised. The bug was reassigned to logol, so the swi-prolog maintainers missed my message.
I checked, there are more reverse build dependencies of swi-prolog, I'm afraid there's more breakage that hasn't been detected yet. (eye seems to go in lockstep, so that package currently seems OK).
Maybe swi-prolog maintainers can comment. Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
