George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 29 June 2006 01:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > > /** > > > * 'Alleged RC4' Source Code picked up from the news." > > > * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John L. Allen)" > > > * Newsgroups: comp.lang.c" > > > * Subject: Shrink this C code for fame and fun" > > > * Date: 21 May 1996 10:49:37 -0400" > > > */ > > > > I think it should be easy to replace that code by a DFSG-free > > implementation of RC4. Openssl include one. > > I'm afraid that I can not use OpenSSL licensed code into GPL program (shc) > without a special OpenSSL exception given from the shc's upstream, which > unfortunately did not respond to any mail sent yet. Also I'm a litle bit > scared to reimplement that myself - I might introduce hell of bugs at > least ;-) ... deviating from upstream for the matter of that is not a good > idea also.
libgcrypt also has an RC4 implementation. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
