Control: tags -1 moreinfo Drew Parsons: > Package: debhelper > Version: 13.7.1 > Severity: Serious > Justification: FTBFS > Control: block 1012022 by -1 > > fenics-basix 0.4.2-1exp1 is currently failing to build in a > binary-indep build, see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=fenics-basix&arch=all > > The problem occurs when building docs in an > execute_before_dh_install-indep rule. The doc build (via sphinx) > expects the basix python module to have been built. The rules file is > available at > https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/f/fenics-basix/rules-0.4.2-1exp1 > > The python module build is supposed to have been performed already in > an execute_after_dh_auto_install rule (after dh_auto_install has put > the libbasix.so shared library in place). > > We can see in the binary-indep log at > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=fenics-basix&arch=all&ver=0.4.2-1exp1&stamp=1654102080&raw=0 > that libbasix.so did get built by the override_dh_auto_build rule, and > got installed by dh_auto_install -i. > > But after dh_auto_install -i, the next rule that gets run is > execute_before_dh_install-indep. execute_after_dh_auto_install never > gets run. > > This doesn't meet the intention of the rules file. > execute_after_dh_auto_install should be run after dh_auto_install, > with or without the -i flag, shouldn't it? > > In particular, dh --no-act indicates it should have been executed: > > $ dh binary-indep --no-act > dh_testroot -i > dh_prep -i > dh_installdirs -i > dh_auto_install -i > debian/rules execute_after_dh_auto_install > debian/rules execute_before_dh_install-indep > dh_install -i > dh_installdocs -i > ... > > > So it looks like a bug in dh during actual execution, that the > execute_after_dh_auto_install rule is not getting executed. > > This bug is blocking #1012022, which is Severity: serious (FTBFS), > hence I'm marking this bug Severity: serious (FTBFS) to match. > > > [...]
Hi, The bug report contains inconsistent information. The bug report says and includes a dh --no-act that implies there is a rule called "execute_after_dh_auto_install" in debian/rules. However, the rules files provided via "https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/f/fenics-basix/rules-0.4.2-1exp1"; does *not* have that rule. Instead it has the "execute_after_dh_auto_install-arch" rule, which would explain a lot of the issues you are reporting. If you have linked to the wrong debian/rules file, then please provide an updated link. Thanks, ~Niels
