Very interesting; font bkai gets stuck during the fontforge compilation at 21900/1114292 and stays at 100% CPU usage. Other fonts seem fine. This requires a bit more investigating. My gut tells me the recent fontforge upload has a regression somewhere.
-- Danai On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 22:42, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <danai.sae...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Lucas, I'll look at it tonight. > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 22:04 Lucas Nussbaum, <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic >> Version: 1.24 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: FTBFS >> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs >> User: lu...@debian.org >> Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm >> >> Hi, >> >> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build >> on amd64. >> >> >> Relevant part (hopefully): >> > Reading subfont definition file >> `/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/sfd/ttf2pk/Unicode.sfd'... >> > Writing extended font definition file `c70bsmi.fdx'... >> > >> > # Remove the *.enc files; they're not used. >> > ( cd build/bsmi00lp && rm -f *.enc ) >> > >> > # Create a Type1 font map. >> > >> > # Create entries for the font definition file >> > # `c00bsmi.fd' (which uses UBig5 encoding). >> > >> > # Create entries for the font definition file >> > # `c70bsmi.fd' (which uses Unicode encoding). >> > >> > touch build-stamp.bsmi >> > E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity >> >> >> The full build log is available from: >> >> http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/07/16/latex-cjk-chinese-arphic_1.24_unstable.log >> >> All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220716;users=lu...@debian.org >> or: >> >> https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220716&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results >> >> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at >> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to >> contribute! >> >> If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as >> 'affects'-ing >> this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects >> >> If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it >> with mine >> so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. >> >>