On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote: > you did not reply to my last mail, so it is obvious that you have no > arguments to prove the claim that cdrtools has license problems or > may be undistributable by Debian.
I have not responded because they do not raise any issues which are of any interest to me, nor do they adequately address the crux of the argument as presented in the two paragraphs in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. [1] I do not have copious amounts of time to spend discussing oversimplificiations of the licenses with you; if you can distill your arguments into a short, well formulated message that precisely explains why the clauses I have identified do not conflict with appropriate verbatim inclusions of the clauses and why you interpret them that way, and citations of case law,[1] I will respond. Otherwise, feel free to continue having your opinion and expressing it, but don't expect me to respond or suddenly change my position. Don Armstrong 1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350739;msg=171 2: This means court cases which illustrate the point that you're trying to prove, preferably in the US, not websites that claim German law actually applies to the US without case law indicating the precise depth thereof. -- She was alot like starbucks. IE, generic and expensive. -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch3.htm http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]