Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2022 22:56:44 +0000
with message-id <e1ors5k-00ebqo...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#998932: fixed in pentium-builder 0.21+nmu2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998932,
regarding pentium-builder: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch 
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998932: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998932
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pentium-builder
Version: 0.21+nmu1
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pentium-builder
Source-Version: 0.21+nmu2
Done: Marcos Talau <ta...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pentium-builder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcos Talau <ta...@debian.org> (supplier of updated pentium-builder package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 19:30:32 -0300
Source: pentium-builder
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21+nmu2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alex Pennace <a...@pennace.org>
Changed-By: Marcos Talau <ta...@debian.org>
Closes: 998932
Changes:
 pentium-builder (0.21+nmu2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/rules: Add build-{arch,indep} (Closes: #998932).
Checksums-Sha1:
 8ec954d2da0c41a0aab87439fa388b403334207a 1429 pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2.dsc
 8a6325cf8bad216559bf859520b7dd93a19107cb 6027 pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2.tar.gz
 3e5ae7558649cc12344f8687e24e8488ade3ccc3 5845 
pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 47564447a6d7508916d5b36145948ea1695655e6375e5274a8103ca703fdbd84 1429 
pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2.dsc
 fef85d979fa7819ad0a458d4da7759b3d7a8ecfc154ba35ec6aa9aa8c0a80ecb 6027 
pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2.tar.gz
 c42c888b5ef884bb88f751fd26c8d903c22f1d21ca3e9560e668a4e849f55168 5845 
pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 e1679b1f44018ce5e4bb33c3733ea1fc 1429 devel extra pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2.dsc
 32ece1b7b4b6e08518f60603e903edc0 6027 devel extra 
pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2.tar.gz
 85ca109865aa432e01b515863f7cabe9 5845 devel extra 
pentium-builder_0.21+nmu2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bzGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to