Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2022 08:44:33 +0100 with message-id <c7e642d3-511b-ba60-11be-890d80fb8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: src:gmsh: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: libgmm++-dev has caused the Debian Bug report #1024164, regarding src:gmsh: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: libgmm++-dev to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1024164: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024164 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: gmsh Version: 4.8.4+ds2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Control: block -1 by 1023788 Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be removed from testing, but unfortunately there are multiple scenarios where that can happen nevertheless. To uphold our social contract, Debian requires that packages can be rebuild from source in the suite we are shipping them, so currently this is a serious issue with your package in testing. Can you please investigate the situation and figure out how to resolve it? Regularly, if the build dependency is available in unstable, helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process in some other way.In this case, src:getfem took over from src:getfem++ but it is blocked because if fails to build from source on s390x, see bug #1023788.Paul Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my process. [1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.htmlOpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:22:58 +0100 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:In this case, src:getfem took over from src:getfem++ but it is blocked because if fails to build from source on s390x, see bug #1023788.libgmm++-dev migrated. PaulOpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---