Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:29:38 +0000
with message-id <e1p7nha-000vi2...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1026326: fixed in procps 2:4.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026326,
regarding procps breaks pslist autopkgtest
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1026326: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026326
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: procps, pslist
Control: found -1 procps/2:4.0.2-2
Control: found -1 pslist/1.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of procps the autopkgtest of pslist fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of procps from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form:

                       pass            fail
procps                 from testing    2:4.0.2-2
pslist                 from testing    1.4.0-4
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of procps to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=procps

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/pslist/29462267/log.gz


#   Failed test 'run the test tool succeeded'
#   at t/lib/Test/PSList.pm line 64.
#          got: 255
#     expected: 0

#   Failed test 'run the test tool did not output any errors'
#   at t/lib/Test/PSList.pm line 65.
# got: 'Parent: pslist did not return information about some children: 793 794 795 796 797 798
# '
#     expected: ''
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 2.
t/01-test-tool.t ...... 1..2
not ok 1 - run the test tool succeeded
not ok 2 - run the test tool did not output any errors
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/2 subtests t/02-feature-check.t .. 1..3
# Subtest: Check for the pslist feature
    1..2
    ok 1 - check for the "pslist" feature succeeded
    ok 2 - check for the "pslist" feature did not output any errors
ok 1 - Check for the pslist feature
# Subtest: pslist feature version >= 1
    1..2
    ok 1 - the "pslist" feature >= 1 succeeded
    ok 2 - the "pslist" feature >= 1 did not output any errors
ok 2 - pslist feature version >= 1
# Subtest: pslist feature version < 1000
    1..2
    ok 1 - the "pslist" feature < 1000 succeeded
    ok 2 - the "pslist" feature < 1000 did not output any errors
ok 3 - pslist feature version < 1000
ok

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/01-test-tool.t    (Wstat: 512 (exited 2) Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
Files=2, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.24 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.28 CPU)
Result: FAIL
autopkgtest [05:15:26]: test upstream

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: procps
Source-Version: 2:4.0.2-3
Done: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
procps, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1026...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> (supplier of updated procps package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:06:38 +1100
Source: procps
Architecture: source
Version: 2:4.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org>
Closes: 192635 1025915 1026326
Changes:
 procps (2:4.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Pino Toscano ]
   * Drop the Debian menu file: (Closes: #192635)
     - the Debian menu is deprecated for some years already
     - the menu item does not have an icon
     - the menu item is for a terminal, and generally GUI environments have 
their
       own process listing application
 .
   [ Craig Small ]
   * ps: correct BSD c option Closes: #1026326
   * skill: fix -p option Closes: #1025915
Checksums-Sha1:
 5122f816ab73122a5f2af1d8e1aa8b7eba3c7e9c 2127 procps_4.0.2-3.dsc
 69880198c824ad816ae9b759aaf038e6b2791f69 28540 procps_4.0.2-3.debian.tar.xz
 fb525d42b3175292d92160236fe828a77b62f6ee 7684 procps_4.0.2-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 927de59c0fb3b3f1ccfd685ebd578fdd9ca524135f15810f766be2f6be5a7e83 2127 
procps_4.0.2-3.dsc
 64d3bd71b6a65f8888c5aa0da0e39b48498787c34eb95babd6ef46c5c5a3a910 28540 
procps_4.0.2-3.debian.tar.xz
 f610599a7a8426f31c119bfe09c7d040454dfae3ff8b523243cd026a65d6f155 7684 
procps_4.0.2-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 79d7f7ae48b3c54295cac3ffdde6b8cb 2127 admin optional procps_4.0.2-3.dsc
 c5228c6967b6aaeffcce4be6b8928001 28540 admin optional 
procps_4.0.2-3.debian.tar.xz
 fa140456e54f2fc42cbe5b0a11a6ee8c 7684 admin optional 
procps_4.0.2-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ct06
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to