On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 20:27:02 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > > # Failed test (t/cz-03zlib-v1.t at line 713) > > > # got: 1 > > > # expected: -3 > > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 471. > > > t/cz-03zlib-v1.t ................ > > > 1..471 > > I think this has to do with zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 and > libcompress-raw-zlib-perl and (a bit) > https://github.com/pmqs/Compress-Raw-Zlib/issues/20 > > If I rebuild libcompress-raw-zlib-perl (against zlib 1.2.13) and then > rebuild libio-compress-perl, its tests pass. > > > PS: This also reminds me that #1024179 in libcompress-raw-zlib-perl > is still not closed.
And using the same patch as in #1024179 als make this test here pass:
#v+
--- a/t/cz-03zlib-v1.t
+++ b/t/cz-03zlib-v1.t
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
use CompTestUtils;
use Symbol;
-use constant ZLIB_1_2_12_0 => 0x12C0;
+use constant ZLIB_1_2_12_0 => '1.2.12';
+my $Zlib_ver = Compress::Raw::Zlib::zlib_version ;
BEGIN
{
@@ -704,7 +705,7 @@
# Z_STREAM_END returned by 1.12.2, Z_DATA_ERROR for older zlib
# always Z_STREAM_ENDin zlib_ng
- if (ZLIB_VERNUM >= ZLIB_1_2_12_0 || Compress::Raw::Zlib::is_zlibng)
+ if ($Zlib_ver gt ZLIB_1_2_12_0 || Compress::Raw::Zlib::is_zlibng)
{
cmp_ok $status, '==', Z_STREAM_END ;
}
#v-
Does this make sense?
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
