Your message dated Wed, 04 Jan 2023 21:33:47 +0000 with message-id <e1pdbon-004v3r...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#460232: fixed in pam 1.5.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #460232, regarding Please clarify license to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 460232: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: pam Version: 0.99.7.1-5 Hi! The copyright file contains: ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GNU GPL are required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions. (This clause is necessary due to a potential conflict between the GNU GPL and the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.) ... On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. Which version of the GPL does this refer to? The file in common-licenses is now actually GPLv3, but I suspect that Linux-PAM intended to use GPLv2 or GPLv1 here. In any case, I think the license of the package isn't clear. I looked in upstream sources, but couldn't find a copy of the GPL at all, so this problem may be due to upstream. Still, it would be good to fix it. /Simon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: pam Source-Version: 1.5.2-6 Done: Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 460...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> (supplier of updated pam package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 13:15:23 -0700 Source: pam Architecture: source Version: 1.5.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> Changed-By: Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> Closes: 460232 1004000 1022952 1024645 Changes: pam (1.5.2-6) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update debian/copyright, Thanks Bastian Germann, Closes: #460232 * When pam-auth-update is called with --root, use /usr/share/pam-configs from the root not from the host system, Thanks Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, Closes: #1022952 * Build-depend on libcrypt-dev, Closes: #1024645 * Add pam-auth-udpate --disable, Closes: #1004000 * Add autopkgtests Checksums-Sha1: 8965f7e5f1ef5453002d92c9b4508a18b7991052 1998 pam_1.5.2-6.dsc 9f9578052a8467782061011c6c6197b6bee69d9e 122320 pam_1.5.2-6.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 2dbff29f5fc189c95b863ffd690795a7313515619ddadc470eab8a50b7555903 1998 pam_1.5.2-6.dsc 97adad0df930ba5ed52b88bef6d494a1b303ca2eb5be9e347479a23e4d9254fc 122320 pam_1.5.2-6.debian.tar.xz Files: e054ae6cd6a7cfc3a194c9e7b7f5d692 1998 libs optional pam_1.5.2-6.dsc f62abdd59a5b1eab7d9c64cf15a68860 122320 libs optional pam_1.5.2-6.debian.tar.xz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQSj2jRwbAdKzGY/4uAsbEw8qDeGdAUCY7XlGwAKCRAsbEw8qDeG dM4sAP9YCWE0gkQXi+WnfgrAvuN4Y5YBALqLbUyolZfWNKSycgD/Xt36rP95G7jm Fk3Z7jmOH5u08dc+S//zP9TFaCD66Qo= =YfXI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
