Hi Aurelien,

Axel Beckert wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > An alternative is to not try to support all systems and reinvent the
> > wheel, and instead assume a POSIX system.
> 
> I'd say on Debian — independent of the actually used kernel — we can
> do assume this at least.
> 
> > That way the attached patch can be used.
> 
> Nice patch! Thanks!

Hrm, with that patch, autopkgtest fails the test case for #600246,
i.e. it seems to reopen the infamous and seemingly non-trivial
https://bugs.debian.org/600246 — not sure why though. (Wonder if
Thorsten's patch works better for #600246 than the current one. Or
maybe my way of testing is borked?)

At least no more upload this night. Need to dig deeper.

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Reply via email to