Hi Aurelien, Axel Beckert wrote: > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > An alternative is to not try to support all systems and reinvent the > > wheel, and instead assume a POSIX system. > > I'd say on Debian — independent of the actually used kernel — we can > do assume this at least. > > > That way the attached patch can be used. > > Nice patch! Thanks!
Hrm, with that patch, autopkgtest fails the test case for #600246, i.e. it seems to reopen the infamous and seemingly non-trivial https://bugs.debian.org/600246 — not sure why though. (Wonder if Thorsten's patch works better for #600246 than the current one. Or maybe my way of testing is borked?) At least no more upload this night. Need to dig deeper. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE