Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@debian.org> writes: > Agreed. I'm thinking about filing an RM bug against cycle-quotes; its > last release happened 4 years ago (although there are some non-useful > new commits on https://github.com/emacsmirror/cycle-quotes), it fails to > build with Emacs 28, has been blocked for 790 days, and doesn't have any > reverse-dependencies. >
I would say that compared to some contexts, 4 years is not that long for an emacs package to be static. On the other hand, cycle-quotes is not in melpa, and it has pretty low popcon numbers, so it isn't hugely popular. I guess I would be inclined to just let it get removed semi-automatically when the release team notices it has been out of testing for a while.
