On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:17:51 +0200 Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote: > On 29/05/2023 14.57, Luca Boccassi wrote: > >> Side question first: does systemd evaluate both > >> /usr/lib/modules-load.d/* and /lib/modules-load.d/* ? > >> Otherwise all packages shipping something in /lib/modules-load.d/ are > >> broken on unmerged-/usr because their config snippets are not being > >> taken into account. > > > > The correct path since bullseye was /usr/lib/modules-load.d, see: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971282 > > I read this as these packages have been buggy on unmerged-/usr in > bullseye. Why weren't there bugs filed?
Good question, I guess nobody ever noticed because most users are on merged-usr anyway? But as you can see from the bug, it's been years. > > Anyway, we don't really care about what happens on unmerged > > installations, as they are no longer supported since Bookworm. > > Well, there is still limited support, e.g. for buildd usage. But > probably (hopefully?) for the last time. IIRC the plan was to switch buildds as soon as bookworm ships, but I don't think that's finalised. Also I don't think it's supported to install and load kernel modules for a package build, at least I've never came across that, but I might be wrong. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
