Hallo Andreas,

Cyril Brulebois <cy...@debamax.com> (2023-05-27):
> Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (2023-05-04):
> > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
> > As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy
> > for a release, thus the severity.
> 
> For some reason, I didn't receive this bug report or the autoremoval
> notification.
> 
> I've just confirmed that requesting the bouncer's installation, in a
> freshly-installed bookworm VM, leads to the same issue. That's something
> that definitely worked when the bouncer was first introduced, I'm not
> exactly sure why that's no longer the case; I'd be happy to have some
> time to gather my thoughts, and upstream's, regarding this issue.

Alright, with RC 4 out of the way, I'm looking at this issue again, and
it seems the “sibling package” crowdsec-firewall-bouncer is affected by
the exact same issue (not surprisingly). I'm curious as to whether it
showed up in those piuparts tests, if you have bug reports yet to be
filed, or something else.

I might just file a report myself later on, I have to find a solution
anyway, and it should be applicable to both packages… but it'd be better
to have a report filed anyway, for documentation purposes. When that
happens, I'm expecting it to be OK to use the same tags as this bug
report… but I've kept Paul in copy to make sure.


Also, thanks for your QA work in general.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to