On 2023-06-24 22:38:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote: [...]
>> I'll prepare a ruby-activerecord proposed-update targeting bookworm. > > This needs to be fixed in sid first. > > Adding the Conflicts against ruby-arel in ruby-activerecord requires > changes in src:ruby-premailer-rails, too, since that (directly) > build-depends on ruby-arel and indirectly on ruby-activerecord. > Maybe dropping the B-D: ruby-arel is already sufficient. > These changes need to be backported to bookworm-pu as well. > If that is fixed, ruby-arel can be removed from sid (and it could be > considered to remove it from bookworm as well). Just to make sure, someone still is working on this to make sure it's fixed in bookworm? I guess the first step is to wait for the package to transition to trixie and then do the -pu? I suspect it will be hard to test this in trixie since you'd need to upgrade from buster to trixie, right? thanks!