Hi,

在 2023-07-11星期二的 21:54 +0200,Salvatore Bonaccorso写道:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:37:44PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:05 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> 
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 06:30:38PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > Reintroducing the epoch produces the following Lintian ERROR:
> > > > 
> > > > E: dhcpcd source:
> > > > epoch-changed-but-upstream-version-did-not-go-backwards 10.0.1-2 ->
> > > > 1:10.0.1-3 [debian/changelog:1]
> > > 
> > > The lintian tag in it's intention is clear. But I believe in this case
> > > it reports in error. Because the history of the dhcpcd source package
> > > is as follows, cutting of some irrelevant inbetween steps:
> > > 
> > > 0.4-1 -> 1.3.8-0.1 -> 1:0.70-5 (epoch introduced here), then moved
> > > upwards -> 1:3.2.3-11 / 1:3.2.3-11+deb7u1 which was the last version
> > > available for a while.
> > > 
> > > But then we dropped to 10.0.1-1 (which already missed the epoch).
> > > 
> > > Now the lintian just only checks 10.0.1-2 -> 1:10.0.1-3 and thinks to
> > > report that the epoch addition is an error, but it would not if all
> > > the 10.0.1-1, 10.0.1-2 versions already had the epoch still.
> > > 
> > > Does this make sense?
> > 
> > Makes sense to me.
> > 
> > Uploaded to Mentors. Please note that Mentors forces me to 'debuild
> > -sa' because it cannot find the 'orig' on its repository even though
> > it's already in unstable.
> 
> Thanks! Boyuan (CC'ed), can you take it from there and would you be
> willing to sponsor Martin-Éric's work as you did for the previous two
> uploads?

Thanks. Reviewed and uploaded.

Best,
Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to