On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 22:04:24 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > For bullseye I think we should simply pick the upstream commit?
Yes: we didn't keep up with upstream 2.50.x so there are a bunch of unrelated fixes (2.50.4 up to .7) which would be out of scope for a security update. If it was a package I knew better then I might be advocating the new upstream release, but I can't really assess risk vs benefit for librsvg, so cherry-picking the equivalent of .8 and .9 seems more conservative. <https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/librsvg/-/merge_requests/20> compiles successfully, I'll try it in a bullseye VM next. smcv
