On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 08:04:59PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote: > > This does fix the build failure. I was about to push such a change to the > > repo and do a maintainer upload, since I've never been removed from the > > uploaders field after all these years ;) Do you want me to do this, or > > would you be able to do it tonight? Getting openldap to build is a priority > > wrt rebootstrapping 32-bit archs for time_t.
> I wasn't sure where openldap was on the priority list for arm* since it's > still BD-Uninstallable on the buildds. Yes, it's BD-Uninstallable there because it needs manually built to address build loops (ldap->cyrus-sasl2->krb5). > Yes, I can upload it tonight, in a couple of hours from now. Is that OK? Works for me! > > WARNING! > > Running as root! > > There's a fair chance slapd will fail to start. > > Check file permissions! > > > > Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... > > Testing slapd searching... > > Creating a dynamic entry... > > ldapadd failed (255)! > > ../../../tests/scripts/test046-dds: 93: kill: No such process > > > > > > > > > test046-dds failed for mdb after 2 seconds > > (exit 255) > > make[4]: *** [Makefile:303: mdb-mod] Error 255 > I have not seen this failure. Ran it again just now and it passed. But I > only run amd64... I wouldn't be able to dig into that tonight, even if I > could reproduce it. Do you think I should disable the test proactively? Rather than disabling the test in the package, I can do a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck build to help get things bootstrapped in the archive. I'm interested to know if it also shows up on hppa, since that would definitely point to it being time_t related. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature